No items found.
blog
How Extruder Monitoring is Reducing Downtime in Plastics & Packaging Operations in 2026
By: Guidewheel
Updated:
December 19, 2025
10 min read
The gap between average performance and world-class efficiency in plastics extrusion often comes down to a single factor: visibility.
For plant managers and operations directors, the challenge isn't usually a lack of effort from the floor. It’s a lack of actionable data. When you cannot see exactly when an extruder stops, why it stopped, and how long it takes to recover, you are forced to manage through intuition rather than facts.
How Extruder Monitoring is Reducing Downtime in Plastics & Packaging Operations in 2026
Figure 1: Comparative extruder runtime performance across industries. (Source: Guidewheel Performance Analysis, n=4.8 million machine-minutes)
The "Opportunity Gap" in Extrusion
The data indicates a significant variance in how extrusion lines perform. Based on recent performance data, the median runtime for extruders in the Plastics & Packaging sector is 71%.
This is a strong baseline, especially when compared to other sectors like Industrial Machinery (38%) or Chemicals (14%). However, the median only tells half the story.
The top quartile of extruders in this dataset achieves a runtime of 99%.
This 28-point spread between the median performer and the top performer represents the "Opportunity Gap." It suggests that while 71% is typical, near-continuous operation is achievable.
For a plant manager, this gap is the target. Closing it doesn't necessarily require buying new capital equipment. It requires tightening operational processes to minimize the friction that eats away at capacity.
Analyzing the "Why": The 4 Actionable Downtime Drivers
While "No Business/Orders" often dominates statistical downtime (accounting for roughly 65% in this dataset), it is a market factor, not an operational one.
To drive efficiency, we must look at the operational downtime categories—the losses that plant teams can control.
Based on the analysis of over 6,500 events, four primary categories emerge as the biggest opportunities for improvement.
Maintenance & Cleaning (11.5% of Downtime)
This is the second-highest cause of downtime in the sector.
Impact: Accounts for ~11.5% of operational downtime.
Duration: Averages 209 minutes (over 3 hours) per event.
Annual Loss: Approximately 280 hours per year per line.
(Source: Guidewheel Performance Analysis)
The Reality: In plastics, "maintenance" often blurs with "cleaning." A screw pull and clean or a deep purge isn't a five-minute fix. The high average duration suggests that these are often major planned interventions.
The Strategy: Transitioning from reactive to condition-based maintenance is critical here. If you can predict when a screen changer needs attention or when screw wear is affecting output, you can schedule these 3-hour blocks during planned shutdowns rather than interrupting a production run.
Other Operational (8.7% of Downtime)
This category captures the friction of daily manufacturing: administrative stops, shift handoffs, waiting for instructions, or communication delays.
Impact: Accounts for ~8.7% of operational downtime.
Duration: Averages 118 minutes (nearly 2 hours) per event.
Variance: In specific "Packaging & Containers" subsets, this spikes to over 31% of downtime.
(Source: Guidewheel Performance Analysis)
The Reality: Operational downtime is often invisible. It’s the time lost when an operator waits for a quality check or when a forklift is busy.
The Strategy: This is a process issue. Real-time scoreboards that visualize pace and status can help reduce these "soft" losses by keeping everyone aligned on the current production target.
Mechanical Breakdowns (5.5% of Downtime)
These are the unplanned stops—the jammed hoppers, the blown heaters, the drive faults.
Impact: Accounts for ~5.5% of operational downtime.
Duration: Averages 62 minutes per event.
Severity: In packaging-specific environments, this category can account for nearly 29% of downtime due to the complexity of downstream automation.
(Source: Guidewheel Performance Analysis)
The Reality: While less frequent than maintenance events, breakdowns are more disruptive because they are unplanned. A one-hour stop breaks the rhythm of the shift and can lead to scrap upon restart.
The Strategy: Tracking the micro-stops and patterns that precede a breakdown is essential. Often, a machine will stutter or cycle slower before it fails. Monitoring motor current can reveal these precursors.
Staffing Issues (4.7% of Downtime)
Labor shortages remain a persistent challenge in manufacturing.
Impact: Accounts for ~4.7% of operational downtime.
Duration: Averages 202 minutes (over 3 hours) per event.
(Source: Guidewheel Performance Analysis)
The Reality: When staffing issues hit, they hit hard. A missing operator often means a line doesn't run for half a shift.
The Strategy: You cannot hire your way out of a labor crisis easily. There is no single fix, but improving efficiency is a critical lever—allowing one operator to manage more lines through remote monitoring and mobile alerts instead of standing at the HMI.
Changeover Efficiency: Speed vs. Consistency
Changeovers are a necessary in plastics extrusion. The goal isn't just to be fast; it's to be consistent and effective.
The data indicates that Plastics & Packaging facilities are relatively efficient compared to other sectors.
Median Changeover: 23 minutes
Best Recorded: 5 minutes
Chemicals Industry Comparison: 47 minutes (Median)
(Source: Guidewheel Performance Analysis)
The Hidden Problem: While the median remains consistent, there is a 169% variation from shift to shift.
(Source: Guidewheel Performance Analysis)
This means that while Shift A might perform a changeover in 20 minutes, Shift B might take 54 minutes for the exact same task.
This inconsistency kills scheduling accuracy. If you schedule for 20 minutes and it takes 50, you miss your production target.
The Fix: Standardization. Implementing SMED (Single-Minute Exchange of Die) principles can help narrow this spread. But you need to track the data first to identify which shifts or products are causing the variance.
Technical Deep Dive: Single vs. Twin Screw Considerations
While the performance data provides the what, understanding the equipment provides the why. The type of extruder impacts the maintenance strategy.
Single Screw Extruders: These dominate the market (approx. 63% share) due to simplicity and cost-effectiveness (Source: Future Market Insights). However, they are often limited in mixing capability. Performance issues here often manifest as throughput instability or surging, which can be detected via motor current monitoring.
Twin Screw Extruders: These offer superior mixing and flexibility but come with higher complexity. They consume more energy but deliver higher quality for complex compounds (Source: ZSJTJX).
Key Monitoring Difference: For twin-screw machines, gearbox health is critical. The intermeshing screws create significant torque loads. Monitoring vibration and temperature on the gearbox is essential to prevent catastrophic failure, which is far more costly than on a simpler single-screw setup.
The Solution: Real-Time Monitoring & FactoryOps
The data indicates that the biggest losses—maintenance duration, operational friction, and changeover inconsistency—are all solvable with better visibility.
This is where modern monitoring solutions bridge the gap.
Moving Beyond "Clipboards and Excel"
Traditional OEE tracking involves manual logs. Operators write down downtime codes at the end of the shift. This method is inherently flawed because:
It misses micro-stops.
It estimates durations (usually rounding to 15 minutes).
It provides data too late to act on.
The Guidewheel Approach
Guidewheel addresses these specific data gaps through a "FactoryOps" approach—empowering teams with real-time truth rather than management surveillance.
Universal Compatibility: The data shows that facilities run a mix of equipment. Guidewheel uses non-invasive, clip-on sensors that measure the power draw of the machine. This works on a brand-new twin-screw extruder or a 30-year-old legacy line. It does not require complex PLC integration.
Addressing the "Maintenance" Driver: By monitoring the electrical current, the system can detect anomalies. If a motor is drawing more current than usual to maintain speed, it may indicate screen pack clogging, heater band failure, or bearing wear. This allows maintenance to be planned (reducing that 209-minute average duration) rather than reactive.
Addressing "Staffing Issues": Guidewheel acts as a force multiplier. It runs on cellular connections (or facility internet), meaning operators can view the status of every machine on a tablet or phone. One operator can monitor multiple lines remotely, receiving alerts only when a machine stops or drifts out of spec.
Addressing "Changeover Spread":The system automatically tracks when a machine goes idle and when it resumes production at speed. This creates an undeniable timestamp for every changeover. Managers can compare Shift A vs. Shift B objectively, identifying best practices and training gaps to reduce that 169% spread.
Strategic Implementation Roadmap
Transforming operations doesn't happen overnight. It is an iterative process.
Establish the Baseline: Install sensors to capture the actual runtime. Compare your facility against the 71% median reference point.
Categorize the Loss: Use the operator interface to tag downtime reasons. Are you losing more time to "Mechanical Breakdowns" (5.5%) or "Operational" issues (8.7%)?
Attack the Variance: Look at your changeover times. If your spread is high, focus on standardizing the process.
Empower the Floor: Give operators access to the scoreboards. When teams can see the score, they are more likely to work to improve it.
Closing the Gap
The data serves as a reference point, not a judgment. Every facility has unique challenges, materials, and goals. A medical tubing manufacturer will naturally run differently than a recycled pipe producer.
However, the benchmarks from the Guidewheel performance analysis reveal a clear truth: there is likely capacity hidden in your existing equipment.
The difference between the median performance (71%) and top quartile performance (99%) represents millions of dollars in revenue, thousands of pounds of saved scrap, and countless hours of recovered time.
You do not need to build a "lights out" factory to see these gains. You need to turn the lights on regarding your data.
Start Optimizing Your Operations
Transforming your production line starts with seeing the truth of your operation.
"With Guidewheel, we've been able to use the same assets and create more output."
Mike Cavell, VP of Operations, Weatherables via Guidewheel's Customer Research
About the Author
Lauren Dunford is the CEO and Co-Founder of Guidewheel, a FactoryOps platform that empowers factories to reach a sustainable peak of performance. A graduate of Stanford, she is a JOURNEY Fellow and World Economic Forum Tech Pioneer. Watch her TED Talk—the future isn’t just coded, it’s built.
